Parameter == "gamma" ~ "[Normoblast population in the bone marrow]",
Parameter == "M_t_1" ~ "[Macrophage population in the spleen]",
Parameter == "MaxFold" ~ "[Maximum fold increase in RBC production]",
Parameter == "PMF" ~ "[Parasite multiplication]",
Parameter == "rho0" ~ "[Reticulocyte release from bone marrow]",
...
...
@@ -139,12 +158,12 @@ Figure 3 of Appendix 1 shows the haematocrit response and reticulocyte count res
Steven Kho:
> I have done a literature search and couldn't find a reference that states the exact number above or in that range.
> The reference we have previously used for bone marrow cellularity and content is [@Harris62] which states a mean of \(11.1 \times 10^9\) nucleated cells/kg body weight, of which 28.4% are normoblasts.
> Therefore, in an average 60kg Papuan male, this data suggests the bone marrow contains \(6.7 \times 10^{11}\) normoblasts, which is about 2 log-folds higher than the current value in the model.
> If I look at other studies cited in this paper (Table 5), values do fall in this range when you adjust to total bodyweight.
> Could it be possible that the current model value is still corrected per kg bodyweight?
> Were there any clues in the script to where this value was obtained
At steady-state we obtain \(\gamma = `r pretty(pf$gamma)`\), which results in a normoblast population of \(`r pretty(pf$gamma * pf$T_n)`\).
This is \(`r pretty(100 * pf$gamma * pf$T_n / 6.7e11 - 100)`\%\) higher than \(6.7 \times 10^{11}\).